The page you have requested has moved. Please update your bookmarks.

If you are not redirected in 5 seconds, please click here.

 

« Archive                                                                                                                   Print

2009 Newsletter 
May 2009
In This Issue
*Salutations from Puddin...
*Important Notice Regarding Student ID's...
*The Three Little Pigs and the BIG BAD Wolf
*"Fire Safety Begins with Me"..."Fire Safety Begins With Me"...
*Alarm Bells Will Be Ringing...
*Clicking on the "Unsubscribe" logo or link will remove your email from the AList....
Quick Links
 
 
From the Editor's Desk...
A new email address for the newsletter!
 

In an effort to make things easier for our members, sending articles for the newsletter is now easier to remember. 
 
Simply use the email address above and I'll receive your article.  The same criteria still applies. Please put "newsletter" or "article" in the subject line to assure opening.
 
Try it.  You'll like it! 
 
Puddin Race,
St. Lucie County
772-621-3450
Member Section
Members... join our Members only section.  Click Here
 
Already joined? Log in now!
 
Salutations from Puddin
FAFLSEThe number of juveniles setting fires is increasing.  In my own county our numbers more than tripled in the year's first quarter compared to those of last year and we have already surpassed the triple mark for the next quarter.  In a strictly unofficial poll of other departments, most are experiencing a spike in this problematic behavior. 
 
While we have no official place to put the blame,
there are a few obvious "markers" raising their ugly heads:
  1. The drought time of year is here.  We can try rain dances, but we have little control of drought conditions.  More media coverage is helpful to keep the public in the most diligent state of mind possible.
  2. The economy has many families struggling through stressful times.  This makes juveniles act out and often fire is their means. 
  3. The economy has also been the reason many departments have more limited education activities with the public.

Just this week two colleagues in different parts of the state have called to tell me they are expecting their departments to either extremely limit or eliminate Public Education in the next budget year.  And - even if they manage to hang on to their jobs - their budgets for doing so will be curtailed severely.

I feel this is exactly the opposite of where to cut the budget.  When times are stressful is when we need to increase public awareness and education, not decrease it.  It is not as if Public Educators are normally the highest paid persons on the staff.  
 
Education of the public will decrease the number of emergency responses and therefore help preserve the budget.  I find I can't get my head around the fact that many of the number-crunchers can't seem to grasp that simple fact.   
 
Puddin Race, Chair
 
 
Important Notice Regarding Student ID's

Remember... the association no longer accepts social security numbers when signing the sign in sheets at our seminars or conferences. You will need to go to the Florida State Fire College Website, get signed in and get your Student ID. This is the only number that will be accepted.
 
Article Provided by:
Chuck Akers 
Executive Director, FFMIA
The Three Little Pigs and the BIG BAD Wolf
by:  Azarang (Ozzie) Markhah, P.E.CBO,EFO MIFireE 
 
Sixty two years ago, as a result of President Truman's directive, the President's Conference on Fire Prevention convened in Washington D.C., from May 6-8, 1947. In his keynote speech, President Truman stated "The serious losses in life and property resulting annually from fires cause me deep concern. I am sure that such unnecessary waste can be reduced. The substantial progress made in the science of fire prevention and fire protection in this country during the past forty years convinces me that the means are available for limiting this unnecessary destruction."
 
It is important to recognize that despite the title, the 1947 conference was not specifically about fire prevention. The focus of the conference was on a comprehensive assessment of the country's fire service, and an in-depth analysis of the fire problem in America. As a result, the attendees recognized that fire prevention deserves a lot more attention and a much higher priority in addressing the fire problem in our country than ever before. They emphasized on the three (3) E's of fire prevention; Education, Enforcement, and Engineering, as the equally important parts of a nationwide comprehensive fire prevention program.
Percy Bugbee, National Fire Protection Association's (NFPA) legendary General Manager, was one of the main speakers at this conference. In his speech Bugbee emphasized heavily on the importance of public education and stated:
"Fires, like epidemics of disease or crime, can be stamped out successfully only through the collective will and action of society as a whole. The failure of society to prevent fires has been due to the fact that up to now the average American citizen has not appreciated that nearly all fires are due to simple, easily understood acts of carelessness or neglect. Once every man, woman, and child realizes and accepts in daily life the responsibility for simple fire prevention measures, death, injury, and destruction by fire will be substantially reduced. It is worth emphasizing that the failure of society to prevent fires is not due to any mysterious and unknown action of fire. There is hardly any field of scientific investigation where more work has been done than in the field of fire protection and fire prevention. The knowledge as to the causes of fires and how to prevent them and protect against them is available".

Percy Bugbee's professional accomplishments were outlined in a recent article titled "Looking Back", in the 2008 November/December issue of the NFPA Journal. The article mentioned that Bugbee had obtained his engineering degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and yet "although an engineer, Bugbee came to believe that technology alone could not bring about a fire safe world". This explains the reason for Bugbee's emphasis on the importance of our public education efforts in his 1947 speech.

Of course, Bugbee was in agreement with President Truman, that the technology to answer the fire problem in our country has been around for decades. But then, he believed that much more emphasis should be put on the Educational aspect of our fire prevention duties. He believed that we in the fire service, must better educate our public about the dangers of fire and inform them about the consequences of their decisions, and their own roles and responsibilities for their own personal safety.

Now, let's fast-forward a tad to our current times. Through decades of our persistent efforts and strong participation in the code development process, last year, we in the fire service, were finally successful in getting the residential fire sprinkler requirements into the main body of the International Residential Code (IRC).

Despite our success in achieving the overwhelming 2/3 majority of the floor votes in Minneapolis last September, our well respected opponents, the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), has still not acknowledged and accepted this monumental fire and life safety achievement. They are determined to fight against it every step of the way.
Now that the residential fire sprinkler requirement is in the 2009 edition of the IRC code, NAHB is mounting pressure on the states and the local jurisdictions all across the country to not adopt the 2009 edition of the IRC code at all, or at the very least, yank out the residential fire sprinkler requirements of it.

Even more disturbing is the fact that since their failed attempt in Minneapolis last year, they have been lobbying the state legislatures in many of the states, not only to prevent them from adopting these building construction codes, but also to strike away the rights of the local jurisdictions to adopt any building construction codes that are more stringent than the minimum adopted state codes.

My last article titled "What's at Stake" was focused on informing our fire service peers about this dangerous trend, that if successful would allow the special interest groups to dictate the level of community safety and fire protection based on their own meager financial interests.

Undoubtedly, this could have a devastating impact not only on our communities' fire protection and life safety, but also on the safety of our own firefighters for very many decades to come.

My friends, it is rather simple. After all is said and done, just like anything else in life, it all boils down to being able to live with the consequences of our decisions. It is all about being fully aware of the real magnitude of the problem and knowing what the stakes are. We must be well-informed and be willing to accept the consequences of the decisions that we make today, which will have drastic impacts on our lives for many years to come.

That being said, now, even more than ever before, we must truly recognize and appreciate the depth of Bugbee's perspectives. If the public is not well-informed about the problem itself and aware of the consequences of their own decisions; then technology alone will not be enough to address the fire problem.

Bugbee's wisdom is evident in his views that besides utilizing the available technology, we must intensify our focus on better educating our public if we truly intend to substantially reduce the devastation caused by fires in our country.

Bugbee urged us to educate our public so that they are aware of the fire problem and can recognize what is at stake. Knowing the risk factors, failure probabilities and the consequences, they are able to make well-informed decisions about their own safety and also for their communities. Simply said, they must truly believe in the fact that preventing fires is everyone's responsibility.

I believe that Bugbee was absolutely right. Although many things have changed in the past six decades, much remains still the same. If we want to address the fire problem in our country and have safer communities, then we must educate our public about the fire problem and the consequences of their decisions. And that goes the same for our public officials too.

We must educate our elected officials and the public administrators. We must provide them with a true community risk assessment and fire loss management plan. This will allow them to make well informed decisions based on the community's needs and the availability of the current resources, while being fully cognizant of the long term impacts of such decisions.

Our state legislatures and the elected officials at all government levels must be aware that the strength and the integrity of the building construction codes developed at the national levels are the back bone of our communities' life safety and fire protection. And that true consequence of reductions in the levels of life safety requirements identified in these codes, merely for the purposes of appeasing the special interest groups and relieving their mounting political pressures, would only lead to increased property losses, civilian fire fatalities and injuries, and endangering the safety of our firefighters.

Are the state legislators and elected officials aware of what is truly at stake? Are they willing to accept these consequences for many decades to come? Are they willing to jeopardize the safety of our communities, merely for the financial gain of the special interest groups? Is our public fully aware of these issues? The key then is to focus our efforts in better educating our public and our elected officials.

We have known for a long time that if we educate our kids while they are still young and their minds, just like a sponge, can absorb all the information that we provide them, then they have a better understanding and remember the basic fundamentals of fire and life safety when they grow up. Yet, we don't spend much effort on educating them later on in life; but we should!

Just as I was thinking about these issues and I was pondering how we can better communicate with the public we serve, I received an email from a good friend of mine asking for my input on his article. This friend of mine is a fire service leader and we share similar views on very many issues. He has an amazing talent for storytelling and has superb penmanship. In his own style he can explain the complex fire service leadership and risk management issues to kids of all ages from 5 to 95.

When I read the draft of his article titled "The Three Little Pigs", I was truly elated. I thought that it was a brilliant idea to revive those old childhood stories and the famous fables to be able to strike a chord and communicate with our public. After all, what better way to educate our public about the importance of solid prevention and risk management measures, the consequences and failure analysis, than to write an article about "The Three Little Pigs & The Big Bad Wolf"?
 
You all probably remember the story from the nursery rhymes, quite well. But as a brief refresher, the story is about these three little pigs that left their mothers home to be independent and live their lives in their own way and build their own homes. Each went about constructing their homes differently based on their personal preference.

The first little pig built his house with straw. Maybe he was an environmentalist and believed in energy efficient "green" building. Maybe ease of construction and labor cost concerns was his reason for his choice of building construction methods. No one knows since the original author didn't explore that angle of the story. The second little pig made his house, with wood and sticks. Maybe he was aware of the better flame spread properties of wood versus the straw. Regardless though, he built his house with the construction materials of his choice. And, finally the third little pig made his house with bricks. Rumor has it that he might have been quite conscious about his safety and security, knowledgeable about the materials and construction methods, and knew his building construction codes quite well.

Meanwhile, the big bad wolf in the neighborhood got wind of the arrival of these newcomers to his neck of the woods and decided to pay them a visit for lunch. The big bad wolf's first stop was the straw house. The first little pig saw the big bad wolf and decided not to open the door when he heard the knocks. Not being the patient type, the big bad wolf huffed and puffed, and with his first attempt blew the straw house away. There was nothing there at all to protect the first little pig. He met a very tragic ending; although the big bad wolf was quite pleased with his gains. I guess the straw house was no match for the intent and the strength of the big bad wolf destructive will.

Sigh. Only if the first little pig was a little more safety conscious and had known the consequences of his decisions during the construction phase of his little house.

Being greedy, the big bad wolf decided to visit the second house made out of wood and sticks. And, again, since the second little pig decided not to open the door, the big bad wolf huffs and puffs, and after a few attempts was successful to have a lunch meeting with the second little pig.

I guess the second little pig had thought that the strength and durability of his lightweight construction stick house would suffice and could protect him from hazards during such emergency encounters. Not quite. Thus, he did not live with the consequences of his poor decisions, quite literally. Would he have made the same decisions if he had known?

Being on the success streak, the big bad wolf then decided to visit the third little pig living in the brick house. The third little pig heard the knocking on the door. He took a quick peak out of the little peep-hole and decided to decline the big bad wolf's invitation for lunch, and barricaded himself in.

The big bad wolf, not accustomed to rejection, decided to use his old proven huff and puff strategy to bring the third little wolf to submission. But, the third little pig's wise decision to build his house based on the safety requirements of the latest edition of the building construction codes proved to be the smartest thing he ever did to save his life! All of the big bad wolf's huffing and puffing did not have any impact on the structural integrity of the house at all.

Not giving up, the big bad wolf decided to revise his strategy and tried to sneak in the house through the chimney. That proved not to be the smartest decision that the big bad wolf had made. Not being aware of the big pot of boiling water in the fire place below him, the big bad wolf descends down the chimney. Suffice to say that the consequence of the big bad wolf's final decision was quite tragic.

You see my friends; it all boils down to (no pun intended) being well-informed, making the right decisions, and being able to live with the consequence of those decisions. That applies to the wolves and the pigs just the same. It is that simple.

The "Three Little Pigs & The Big Bad Wolf" is great to entertain the kids, but as you can see, it can also be quite an important and useful tool to educate audiences of all ages about the importance of the building construction codes.

I don't know, but just maybe, if sixty two years ago, Percy Bugbee had expressed his perspectives about the importance of fire prevention and public education by writing a similar story titled "The Three Little Pigs & The Big Bad Wolf", by now our public might have truly grasped the wisdom in his views that "once every man, woman, and child realizes and accepts in daily life the responsibility for simple fire prevention measures, death, injury, and destruction by fire will be substantially reduced. "

Maybe, just maybe, if our legendary Francis Brannigan, the author of the famous "Building Construction for the Fire Service" book, had watered it down a tad and written a simplified version of it and titled it "The Three Little Pigs & The Big Bad Wolf" our firefighters would have finally grasped his wisdom by now and would truly "know their enemy". Maybe, just maybe, we would then not lose firefighters lives in the lightweight construction structural collapses.

One thing is for sure though. There are always wolves around in a variety of shapes, sizes, appearances, organizational alliances, special interest groups, etc. We will always have opponents whose interests contradict the safety of our public, communities, and our very own safety. Today it might be the homebuilders that want to have full control of the building construction codes and oppose the residential fire sprinkler and the carbon monoxide detector requirements in the residential codes; but then who knows what comes tomorrow?

The point is though, that we in the fire service must first fully recognize the importance of fire prevention and building construction codes ourselves. We must then educate our public and our elected officials about the risks and the consequences of their decisions in adopting these codes. And we must request that they don't bow down to the political influences of these special interest groups in pressuring them to adopt local codes that are lower than the nationally developed building construction codes.

I truly believe in President Truman's challenge to the 1947 Fire Prevention Conference where he stated that "it is the clear responsibility of every State and local official, and every citizen, to aggressively support this national war against the growing menace of fire."
 
With the current economic challenges that our country is battling, and with and the budget cuts that the fire service is facing all across the land, today it is even more important than ever before for us all to intensify our efforts in better educating our public about the menace of fire.

We in the fire service are well aware that shutting down fire stations and laying off firefighters have direct and immediate impacts on our community's levels of fire safety. But, we also need to recognize that eliminating the pubic education programs, laying off fire inspectors and reducing our code enforcement capabilities, and allowing the special interest groups to dictate adoption of less stringent building construction codes, have long term impacts and reduce our community's safety as well.

When the elected officials are better informed about the basic concepts of community risk assessment and integrated risk management, they could then make better decisions in performing their responsibilities in mitigating hazards and protecting their communities.

Logically then, a major part of our public education efforts must be on better informing our elected officials, so that they are well aware of the true magnitude of failure, and the direct impact and consequences of their decisions on their community's levels of life safety and fire protection.

It is important that we realize the wisdom in the old saying that "you reap the harvest that you sow". Don't believe me? Just ask the "Three Little Pigs & The Big Bad Wolf."
                                                         __._,_.___


"Fire Safety Begins with Me"
 
 "Fire Safety Begins With Me"
A Florida Juvenile Fire Safety Program
Florida Association of Fire and Life Safety Educators
 a section of the
Florida Fire Marshals and Inspectors Association
 
Florida Fire Marshals and Inspectors Association (FFMIA) and Florida Association of Life Safety Educators (FAFLSE) are pleased to present the Florida Juvenile Fire Safety Program "Fire Safety Begins with ME" Program.  This program is targeted to the middle schools with a curriculum and message that reaches out to this student population
The OptiVize Team, led by Jim Gossett partnered with Brian Haas and the Vistalogix team to engage with the FFMIA and FAFLSE leaders on a Juvenile Firesetters FEMA grant.
The focus of the OptiVize Team was on the development, design, execution, and outreach of a Juvenile Fire Prevention program targeted at Florida's middle school students in Grades 6-8.  The goal of the program is to equip educators, teachers, and caregivers with curriculum and tools to provide an age appropriate approach and content for success in this endeavor.
 
The curriculum is focused on three key areas:
·         Fire Science concepts-"Breaking it down"
·         Fire Safety Highlights-"Safety Begins with ME"
·         Legal and Social Issues-"Fire is Dire"
The Florida Juvenile Fire Safety Program "Fire Safety Begins with ME" Program is as straightforward as 1-2-3.
The OptiVize team would like to thank the following members for their guidance and support throughout the process (in alpha order):
 
·         Charles Raiken
·         Chuck Akers
·         Jon Pasqualone
·         Puddin Race
·         Vicky Yeakley
The OptiVize team would like to especially recognize the following Program Core Committee members for their subject matter expertise, best practices, experiences, and insight (in alpha order):
 
·         Barbara Weyel
·         Bob Smallacombe
·         Courtney Palmer
·         Dr Donna Faranda
 
Additional Program details will be shared during the Fire and Life Safety Educators Conference, June 15-18th.
 
Article Provided by:
Jim Gossett, Optivize

Alarm Bells Will Be Ringing
 
This comical note was part of a notice posted on the entrance doors of Boldan office building I was visiting.  The posted flyer had big letters saying "IMPORTANT NOTICE" and warned of the alarm bells that would be ringing at next Thursday's annual fire sprinkler and fire pump test.  I was amused when I read it...at first.  Then, I actually began to become a little disturbed.  Okay, some of you who know me are probably thinking, "He is a little disturbed." 
 
The notice provided minimal information at best, but was typical of many notices I have seen posted for sprinkler and fire alarm testing throughout my career as a fire inspector and now as a life safety and fire code consultant. No time was given for the actual testing period and no contact person was listed whereby you could obtain additional information.
 
The more I thought about the notice and the upcoming test the more I realized that I have never really been comfortable with such notices and the information provided to building occupants during such an event.  Since I was not a tenant in this particular building, I had no idea of the extent of preparation for the test nor the amount and quality of the information provided to the occupants to prepare them for the test.  It is possible, but not likely in my experience, that additional information and instructions were distributed to the occupants to make them aware of what to do in the event of a real fire and a real evacuation notification.
 
If you have ever been involved in a fire alarm test in a high-rise condominium which contained an emergency voice/alarm communications system or "voice evacuation" as it is commonly known, then you may have some reality on the effectiveness of posted notices and voice announcements.  Often during the testing, occupants on the floors that where "in alarm" would come out of their apartments and ask, "Is there a fire?"  "Do I need to evacuate?"  I have actually encountered residents trudging down the stairs on their way out of the building.  This has even occurred when announcements where made prior to each and every alarm; a good habit to get into.  What is the likelihood that those residents will evacuate on a timely basis again on that day or any other day?  Surely, they will wonder if the alarm is real or just a test.
 
The real question is, "What happens in the event of a real fire?"  I have never heard of a fire occurring during such a test but it is possible and most likely has happened before on at least a few occasions.  What should the occupants do to report a fire during the test?  How will they know that they need to evacuate?  When is the test complete and when are the alarms real?  It is a matter of recycling the age old questions of "Who?", "What?", "When?", and "Where?" until all of the contingencies are covered.
 
Simple instructions to call 911 and the security desk might help.  Additional security staff or fire watch who can effect proper detection, notification and even evacuation would be a consideration as well.  Each situation will be different, but advanced planning and effective communication of the temporary emergency plan is vital to the occupants of the building. 
 
Conducting the testing while the building is not occupied would be a very safe option.  Even a recommendation in residential occupancies like apartments and condominiums that the occupants consider being away for the period of the testing could go a long way in mitigating the circumstances.  I recall an incident on a fire alarm test I was once witnessing in a small office building.  A woman was sitting at her desk underneath a blaring horn/strobe complaining about the horrible noise it made.  I suggested that if she did not have any ear plugs available that she might consider taking a break during that phase of the alarm test.  A good practice overall, if it can be accomplished, is to not sound the alarms for any longer than is necessary to conduct the test in any given evacuation zone or to allow the occupants the option to temporarily vacate the building during the test.
 
Who is responsible for all this advanced planning and facillitation?  Of course, the building owner or his designated representative is responsible.  It says so in the codes!  Thank goodness it is not up to the fire marshal or the inspector to be sure that proper notification and instructions have been provided to each occupant.  But does that relieve us of our duty to try and insure that adequate information has been provided?  No, it does not.  Clearly, I could have done a better job had I given thought to the need for such advanced planning and preparation.  Perhaps many of you have not ever really given it any thought beyond requiring that a notice be posted prior to a fire alarm or sprinkler system test.  Unfortunately, that may only be happening on the tests of which you were aware.  Are the contractors providing adequate notification and information on all of their tests?  I really don't know.  Obviously, there is a need to educate not only our own ranks, but the corps of contractors and their agents as well.
 
Impairment procedures are included in the fire codes especially NFPA 1 Uniform Fire Code andNFPA 25 Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems, but only an annex mention of such procedures is found in NFPA 13 Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems and minimal information in NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm Code regarding impairment of fire alarm systems.
 
No where that I found are clear guidelines provided as to what needs to be done in the form of impairment procedures during the testing of fire alarms and associated fire suppression systems.  You may be wondering if the testing of these systems is really an impairment.   I submit that it is a form of impairment that renders the initiation and notification systems unreliable for the period of time that it takes to conduct the test.  This is supported by the following phrase found in the NFPA 72, "The system owner or their designated representative shall be notified when a fire alarm system or part thereof is impaired. Impairments to systems shall include out-of-service events."  NFPA 101 in sections 9.6.1.6 for fire alarms and 9.7.6.1for fire sprinklers requires that the A.H. J. be notified when a system is out of service for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period and requires evacuation of the building or some form of fire watch.  Four hours of testing or more would seem to qualify in this category.
 
In NFPA 72 4.6.3 it states, "Where required, mitigating measures acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction shall be implemented for the period that the system is impaired."   It goes on to state in the annex that, "The need for mitigating measures is typically determined on a case-by-case basis. This considers the building, occupancy type, nature and duration of impairment, building occupancy level during impairment period, active work being conducted on the fire alarm system during the impairment, condition of other fire protection systems and features (i.e., sprinklers, structural compartmentation, etc.), and hazards and assets at risk." 
 
There is no doubt that a responsibility and duty are implied and established for building owner's and their designated representatives, contractors and their agents, and A.H.J.s. 
 
Article Provided by:
Joe Gagliano 

ANNOUNCING



A new email address for the newsletter!
 

In an effort to make things easier for our members, sending articles for the newsletter is now easier to remember.  Simply use the email address above and I'll receive your article.  The same criteria still applies. Please put "newsletter" or "article" in the subject line to assure opening.
 
Try it.  You'll like it! 
Clicking on the "Unsubscribe" logo or link will remove your email from the AList.
   
Please be careful not to remove your email address from our A List.
The AList is our way of communicating with our members. To comply with the rules of email lists we are required to have the option on our emails that allows the recipient to "Unsubscribe" from our list. Once a person has elected to unsubscribe from our system, we cannot automatically add them again.
Copyright © 1999 - 2011 Florida Fire Marshals and Inspectors Association - All Rights Reserved

Site Administration by:  Webmark Studios, LLC